There are many factors in common about growth and development and we can make assumptions about different aspects of same. (For example, the Chapter on Attachment contains many).
However, it is also true that each and every one of us had a unique childhood. Even two children in the same family will have unique experiences. It is important that we take note of this when supporting vulnerable families.
In order to sharpen our perception it is helpful to reflect on our own childhood and teenage years, (and indeed our years as adults also), to see how and where we felt included, that is, felt a genuine sense of belonging where we did not fear judgement, and where we could be ourselves, warts and all – as is said.
Indeed this is the first task of a baby – to make himself included. If he fails in that task he will not survive. He needs to bond with an older human being (almost always mother) so that he will be fed, clothed, kept warm, kept from danger, allowed sleep in peace, i.e. have his basic physical needs met so that he can thrive.
Because most of us would deem a baby, just born, to be absolutely and totally dependent, it is interesting to place the responsibility for ensuring initial inclusion on the baby just to see what emotions and thoughts it stirs in us!
Though maybe it’s not that strange. The fictional story of Tarzan, who found apes to care for him has always been popular. And legend has it that the city and then empire of Rome was founded by twins (Romulus and Remus) who, abandoned by their jealous father and left to die, managed to find a she-wolf to feed and protect them. And Moses being found in a basket was an important event in the Old Testament – as he grew up to be a great leader.
These iconic stories – there may be others in different cultures – contain hints that we are aware of the baby’s task in the project of seeking care immediately after being born.
Getting back to our three elements, I believe that the opportunity for the baby to experience boundedness will come almost at the same time as his initial feelings of inclusion, that is, very quickly. Perhaps creativity comes a little later – his tendency to be creative may depend on how healthy his experiences of early inclusion and boundedness have been.
To expand on this – very early on in his life, in a healthy, well-functioning, family situation, as he grows to be a toddler, he succeeds in establishing healthy relationships with his principal carers and begins to feel that he has intrinsic value. If he is consistently included, and trusts that the feeling of inclusiveness will not be suddenly torn away he is well on the road to finding meaning in a boundary (i.e. it is not the end of the world, or he doesn’t feel he loses if he does not get his own way in something).
He will also begin to trust that if he is creative, takes a risk, (almost all creativity involves taking a risk of sorts) and he makes a mistake, it will not result in him losing the feeling of inclusiveness that is so important. (We have discussed this already in the Sub-Chapter on Attachment Theory – when we described the secure base).
Like our core beliefs in the previous post, it is recommended that we do some self-reflection on all the above; and where/when/how we felt included. In this, we can identify situations where we truly felt included as a young child, and try and remember what factors assured us (that is, how did we know, truly), that we were included.
Reflection might also include identification of who were the most significant people in our lives when it came to a boundary? (That is, what is right or wrong, what is better or worse, what is good or bad etc.). Was it Mammy or Daddy? This, in my experience, often throws up surprises.
The reason it might be surprising is that mature reflection, in the presence of a trusted other, often reveals and/or identifies aspects of power that we might have taken for granted or forgotten. For example, what was it about someone in authority that we permitted them to impose a boundary that was difficult for us to accept?
Was it physical size, threatening demeanour or loud voice? Was it their ability to argue a rationale? Was it our dependence on them? Or was it their strong personality? (How do we recognise a strong personality)?
In terms of creativity, it is always self-affirming to identify a time or times in our lives where we really felt that our potential expanded, where we felt free to play and experiment, that opened our minds and heart to new experiences, and where we felt we could be truly creative.
This might throw up more surprises, as there may have been factors that have been consigned to the wheelie-bins of our memories that were actually very important, and allowed us to be creative in certain situations!